Using fontspec with XeTeX or LuaTex and things like char'1240D, you could easily typeset what you need. We argue that under no circumstances does religion justify harming women therefore nation states must proactively limit religious extremists who incite harm directed at women, and punish those responsible for mutilating, injuring, and humiliating women. There is a paleo-babylonian font on this page. It is quite a complicated system, but it was used by other cultures, such as the Greeks, as it had advantages over their own systems. While we examine recent court cases where nation states grapple with the tension created by women’s inferior status in religion we note the paucity of consistent efforts to protect women in the face of religious extremism. It started about 1900 BC to 1800 BC but it was developed from a number system belonging to a much older civilisation called the Sumerians. When state agents fail to proactively prevent, much less punish religious extremist actors who deliberately harm women - in the name of faith - the state’s tacit support emboldens extremists. People of extreme faith justify harmful practices through a narrow and absolute interpretation of scripture that leaves little room for critical reflection or evolving modern views. Initially, we highlight religious-based practices including honor killings, female genital mutilation, extreme modesty regulations, disparity in education, and strict segregation that place women in direct harm - some resulting in death. This paper explores practices designed to humiliate, denigrate, and subjugate female members in religious extremist paradigms we focus on Islamic extremism and ultra-Orthodox Judaism. Bilateral Agreement between the Republic of Afghanistan and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the Voluntary Return of Refugees, supra note 11, at 10.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |